Skip to content

chore(deps): bump django-admin-rest-api to ^1.0.1#553

Merged
MartinCastroAlvarez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
build/bump-django-admin-rest-api-1.0.1
May 28, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): bump django-admin-rest-api to ^1.0.1#553
MartinCastroAlvarez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
build/bump-django-admin-rest-api-1.0.1

Conversation

@MartinCastroAlvarez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Bumps django-admin-rest-api from ^1.0.0 to ^1.0.1. Lock file refreshed (poetry lock); the lock pins 1.0.1 precisely.

What's in 1.0.1 (upstream)

  • Django 5.0 compatibility for log_deletion. 1.0.0 assumed ModelAdmin.log_deletions (plural) was on every supported Django, but 5.0 only has the singular form. The shim now prefers log_deletions on 5.1+ and falls back to log_deletion on 5.0.
  • CI matrix expanded to Django 6.0 upstream.

Verification

  • poetry install resolves
  • poetry run pytest -x42/42 pass against 1.0.1

Upstream links

1.0.1 ships:
- Django 5.0 compatibility for the destroy code path. The 1.0.0
  log_deletion shim assumed ModelAdmin.log_deletions (plural) was on
  every supported Django, but 5.0 only has the singular form. 1.0.1
  prefers log_deletions on 5.1+ and falls back to log_deletion on 5.0.
- CI matrix in the sibling repo now spans the full Python 3.10–3.13
  x Django 5.0–6.0 cross-product, so we can rely on the dep across
  every (python, django) cell this repo targets.

Verified: poetry install resolves cleanly, the 42 tests in this
repo's suite all pass against 1.0.1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@MartinCastroAlvarez MartinCastroAlvarez deleted the build/bump-django-admin-rest-api-1.0.1 branch May 28, 2026 13:09
@MartinCastroAlvarez MartinCastroAlvarez restored the build/bump-django-admin-rest-api-1.0.1 branch May 28, 2026 13:10
@MartinCastroAlvarez MartinCastroAlvarez merged commit 0f6c4cd into main May 28, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@MartinCastroAlvarez MartinCastroAlvarez deleted the build/bump-django-admin-rest-api-1.0.1 branch May 28, 2026 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants